GW 26 Intermediate Results

GW 26 Intermediate Results – Tuesday

Please welcome to the intermediate results of GW 26 with the following bonus points according to the BPS:

  • Vlaar(3), Marshall(3), Turner(1), Caulker(1), Theophile(1), Guzan(1)
  • Fonte(3), Chambers(3), Boruc(1)
  • Cillins(3), Noble(2), Diame(2)
  • Ivanovic(3), David Luiz(3), Anichebe(3)

Expected average is 12-13 points, 3 players have played per average team. Average score in the top 10K is 17.8 points, 3.7 players have played.

SUMMARY

Random Sample Top 10K
Number of Managers 20,000 10,000
GW26 Average Score 13.0 17.8
Average Points Deducted for Point Hits 0.5 0.7
Players Played per Team (out of 12) 2.9 3.7
Captains Played 10.8% 4.9%

GAMEWEEK RANK PROJECTIONS

click

AVERAGE POINTS DISTRIBUTION

GW26Average

AVERAGE POINTS PER TEAM BY SOURCE OF POINTS

Random Sample Top 10K
Source of Points Points % of the Average Points % of the Average
Minutes Played 5.6 43.3% 7.4 41.4%
Goals Scored 2.2 16.8% 2.5 14.2%
Assists 1.2 9.3% 1.9 10.4%
Clean Sheet Points 2.9 22.4% 4.3 24.1%
Goals Conceded -0.0 -0.2% -0.0 -0.1%
Own Goals and Penalty Misses 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0%
Red and Yellow Cards -0.6 -4.3% -0.5 -2.8%
Saves and Penalty Saves 0.2 1.4% 0.6 3.2%
Bonus Points 1.5 11.6% 1.8 9.9%
TOTAL 13.0 100.0% 17.8 100.0%

10 PLAYERS CONTRIBUTING THE MOST TO THE AVERAGE

Random Sample Top 10K
Player GW Points Per Average Team % of the Average Player GW Points Per Average Team % of the Average
Fonte 14 2.5 19.5% Lallana 6 3.7 20.7%
Lallana 6 2.0 15.1% Fonte 14 2.3 13.1%
Ivanovic 10 1.5 11.7% Hazard 2 1.9 10.8%
Hazard 2 0.9 6.7% Ivanovic 10 1.7 9.8%
Shaw 5 0.7 5.7% Boruc 8 1.2 6.9%
Boruc 8 0.4 3.4% Collins 15 1.2 6.8%
David Luiz 7 0.4 2.9% Adrián 8 0.9 5.3%
Collins 15 0.3 2.7% Shaw 5 0.8 4.5%
Rodriguez 2 0.3 2.7% Marshall 11 0.7 4.1%
Oscar 3 0.3 2.6% Rodriguez 2 0.4 2.2%

AVERAGE POINTS PER TEAM BY LINE IN FORMATION

Random Sample Top 10K
Line in Formation Points % of the Average Points % of the Average
Goalkeeper 1.2 9.6% 3.3 18.2%
Defenders 6.6 50.8% 7.7 43.0%
Midfielders 4.1 31.6% 6.2 34.7%
Forwards 1.0 8.0% 0.7 4.1%
Points for Captain 0.6 4.3% 0.2 1.1%
Points on the Bench 4.5 34.6% 4.0 22.2%
TOTAL 13.0 100.0% 17.8 100.0%

AVERAGE POINTS BY POSITION

Random Sample Top 10K
Position Points Points
Goalkeeper 5.3 7.2
Defender 7.7 6.9
Midfielder 3.4 3.5
Forward 2.0 2.0
(*) This table only accounts for players who have played positive minutes this week

GW 26 HALL OF FAME

Random Sample Top 10K
Maximum Points 55 points 58 points
Best Defense Line 43 points 50 points
Best Midfield Line 25 points 19 points
Best Forward Line 15 points 7 points
Best Bench 37 points 32 points
Bonus Points Magnet 11 points 12 points

GW 26 HALL OF SHAME

Random Sample Top 10K
Minimum Points 0 points 0 points
Worst Defense Line 0 points 0 points
Worst Midfield Line 0 points 0 points
Worst Forward Line 0 points 0 points
Cards Magnet -4 points -3 points

About This Post

In this post, I take a look at 2 samples: randomly selected 20,000 FPL teams and the top 10,000 FPL teams. Because of the law of large numbers, we can make inferences about the overall FPL league based on the statistics for the random sample. Interval estimates for most statistics for the whole FPL game are also available. If you’re familiar with the concept of confidence intervals, you can point at a specific number characterising the random sample to see 99% confidence intervals for the respective number characterising all the 3 million FPL managers.

About these ads

2 comments on “GW 26 Intermediate Results – Tuesday

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s